{"id":1224,"date":"2021-12-02T11:49:35","date_gmt":"2021-12-02T11:49:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/?p=1224"},"modified":"2021-12-16T09:33:32","modified_gmt":"2021-12-16T09:33:32","slug":"hermeneutik-und-recht-im-18-jahrhundert","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/2021\/12\/02\/hermeneutik-und-recht-im-18-jahrhundert\/","title":{"rendered":"Hermeneutik und Recht im 18. Jahrhundert"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1>Jahrgang 45 (2021) Heft 2<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Heft<\/strong><br>2 (2021)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Jahrgang<\/strong><br>45<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Konzipiert von Frank Grunert und Denis Thouard<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Aus der Arbeit der DGEJ<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Zu diesem Heft (Stefanie Stockhorst)<\/li><li>Die Welt im Dorf: Begegnungen mit dem Fremden und Exotischen im 18. Jahrhundert jenseits der gro\u00dfen Globalisierungszentren. Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr die Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts vom 09.-10. September 2021 an der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenb\u00fcttel. Tagungsbericht (Maren Elisabeth Schwab)<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Beitr\u00e4ge<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Frank Grunert, Denis Thouard: Einleitung. Hermeneutik und Recht im 18. Jahrhundert. S. 171-175<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Jan Schr\u00f6der: Theorien der Gesetzesinterpretation in der Neuzeit. Ein \u00dcberblick. <br>S. 176-193 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> This article describes the legal theory of interpretation in modern times and also attempts to provide an outlook on general hermeneutics. In the first part, three stages of hermeneutic epistemology are presented. The second part deals with the technique of interpretation: its goal, which changes with the transformation from a value-laden to a value-free concept of law, and its tools, which gradually merge to form the modern \u203acanon of four\u2039 of grammatical, historical, systematic and teleological interpretation. The third part discusses the limits of hermeneutics in practical scholarship. \/ Cet article d\u00e9crit la th\u00e9orie juridique de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9poque moderne et tente \u00e9galement de donner un aper\u00e7u de l\u203aherm\u00e9neutique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale. Dans la premi\u00e8re partie, trois phases de l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie herm\u00e9neutique sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es. La deuxi\u00e8me partie traite de la technique de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation: d\u2019une part de son objectif qui \u00e9volue \u2013 passant d\u2019un concept du droit charg\u00e9 de valeurs \u00e0 un concept du droit ind\u00e9pendant de toute valeur \u2013, d\u2019autre part de ses outils qui fusionnent progressivement pour constituer le \u203aquadricanon\u2039 moderne de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation grammaticale, historique, syst\u00e9matique et t\u00e9l\u00e9ologique. La troisi\u00e8me partie expose les limites de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique dans la science pratique.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> This article describes the legal theory of interpretation in modern times and also attempts to provide an outlook on general hermeneutics. In the first part, three stages of hermeneutic epistemology are presented. The second part deals with the technique of interpretation: its goal, which changes with the transformation from a value-laden to a value-free concept of law, and its tools, which gradually merge to form the modern \u203acanon of four\u2039 of grammatical, historical, systematic and teleological interpretation. The third part discusses the limits of hermeneutics in practical scholarship. \/ Cet article d\u00e9crit la th\u00e9orie juridique de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9poque moderne et tente \u00e9galement de donner un aper\u00e7u de l\u203aherm\u00e9neutique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale. Dans la premi\u00e8re partie, trois phases de l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie herm\u00e9neutique sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es. La deuxi\u00e8me partie traite de la technique de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation: d\u2019une part de son objectif qui \u00e9volue \u2013 passant d\u2019un concept du droit charg\u00e9 de valeurs \u00e0 un concept du droit ind\u00e9pendant de toute valeur \u2013, d\u2019autre part de ses outils qui fusionnent progressivement pour constituer le \u203aquadricanon\u2039 moderne de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation grammaticale, historique, syst\u00e9matique et t\u00e9l\u00e9ologique. La troisi\u00e8me partie expose les limites de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique dans la science pratique.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Laetitia Ramelet: Rechtswirksamkeit durch Auslegung. Prinzipien der juristischen Auslegung in Grotius\u2019 <em>De Iure Belli ac Pacis<\/em> (1625). S. 194-206 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> The present contribution aims to reconstruct the main principles of Grotius\u2019s theory of legal interpretation in his masterwork De Jure Belli ac Pacis, with an emphasis on his search for principles conducive to contractual exchanges between the members of a society. This approach is particularly reflected in his reliance on the notions of probability and rational intention to establish the principles of his theory. \/ La pr\u00e9sente contribution vise \u00e0 reconstituer les principes essentiels de la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation juridique de Grotius dans son \u0153uvre ma\u00eetresse De Jure Belli ac Pacis, en mettant l\u2019accent sur sa recherche de principes d\u2019interpr\u00e9tation favorables aux \u00e9changes contractuels entre les membres d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9. Cette approche se refl\u00e8te particuli\u00e8rement dans son usage des notions de probabilit\u00e9 et d\u2019intention rationnelle pour \u00e9tablir les principes de sa th\u00e9orie.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> The present contribution aims to reconstruct the main principles of Grotius\u2019s theory of legal interpretation in his masterwork De Jure Belli ac Pacis, with an emphasis on his search for principles conducive to contractual exchanges between the members of a society. This approach is particularly reflected in his reliance on the notions of probability and rational intention to establish the principles of his theory. \/ La pr\u00e9sente contribution vise \u00e0 reconstituer les principes essentiels de la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation juridique de Grotius dans son \u0153uvre ma\u00eetresse De Jure Belli ac Pacis, en mettant l\u2019accent sur sa recherche de principes d\u2019interpr\u00e9tation favorables aux \u00e9changes contractuels entre les membres d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9. Cette approche se refl\u00e8te particuli\u00e8rement dans son usage des notions de probabilit\u00e9 et d\u2019intention rationnelle pour \u00e9tablir les principes de sa th\u00e9orie.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Frank Grunert: <em>De Interpretatione<\/em>. Die Hermeneutik in den deutschen Naturrechtslehren. <br>S. 207-219 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> In the classical works on natural law from the 17th century \u2013 Grotius, Pufendorf, Thomasius \u2013 hermeneutics is discussed in detail as interpretatio with a view to the necessary determination of the normative content of expressions of will in contracts and laws. The article shows what hermeneutics achieves in natural law and that its separation from natural law, which has not gone unchallenged, can ultimately be chalked up as a gain in differentiation. \/ Dans les ouvrages classiques de droit naturel du XVIIe si\u00e8cle \u2013 Grotius, Pufendorf, Thomasius \u2013 l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique est discut\u00e9e en d\u00e9tail en tant qu\u2019 interpretatio au regard de la d\u00e9termination n\u00e9cessaire du contenu normatif des expressions de la volont\u00e9 dans les contrats et les lois. L\u2019article montre les accomplissements de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique dans le droit naturel et d\u00e9montre que sa s\u00e9paration du droit naturel, qui n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 incontest\u00e9e, peut finalement \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un gain de diff\u00e9renciation.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> In the classical works on natural law from the 17th century \u2013 Grotius, Pufendorf, Thomasius \u2013 hermeneutics is discussed in detail as interpretatio with a view to the necessary determination of the normative content of expressions of will in contracts and laws. The article shows what hermeneutics achieves in natural law and that its separation from natural law, which has not gone unchallenged, can ultimately be chalked up as a gain in differentiation. \/ Dans les ouvrages classiques de droit naturel du XVIIe si\u00e8cle \u2013 Grotius, Pufendorf, Thomasius \u2013 l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique est discut\u00e9e en d\u00e9tail en tant qu\u2019 interpretatio au regard de la d\u00e9termination n\u00e9cessaire du contenu normatif des expressions de la volont\u00e9 dans les contrats et les lois. L\u2019article montre les accomplissements de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique dans le droit naturel et d\u00e9montre que sa s\u00e9paration du droit naturel, qui n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 incontest\u00e9e, peut finalement \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un gain de diff\u00e9renciation.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Oliver R. Scholz: \u00bbUnd dieses dienet auch zur Auslegungskunst [&#8230;]\u00ab. Zur Rolle von Pr\u00e4sumtionen in Recht und Hermeneutik. S. 220-233 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> The first part examines, especially with regard to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, how the concept of presumption was extracted from the legal doctrine of evidence and generalised and further developed for general epistemology and methodology. In the second part, selected examples from the 17th and 18th centuries are used to show how the concepts of presumption and presumption rule have been applied in hermeneutics to specify and systematise the hermeneutical rules that have been handed down. I will conclude with an appeal to German-speaking lawyers. \/ La premi\u00e8re partie examine, notamment en ce qui concerne Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, comment le concept de pr\u00e9somption a \u00e9t\u00e9 extrait de la doctrine juridique de la preuve, puis g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9 et d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 pour l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie et la m\u00e9thodologie g\u00e9n\u00e9rales. Dans la deuxi\u00e8me partie, des exemples choisis des XVIIe et XIIIe si\u00e8cles sont utilis\u00e9s pour montrer comment les concepts de pr\u00e9somption et de r\u00e8gle de pr\u00e9somption ont \u00e9t\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9s en herm\u00e9neutique pour sp\u00e9cifier et syst\u00e9matiser les r\u00e8gles herm\u00e9neutiques qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 transmises. Je conclurai par un appel aux juristes germanophones.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> The first part examines, especially with regard to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, how the concept of presumption was extracted from the legal doctrine of evidence and generalised and further developed for general epistemology and methodology. In the second part, selected examples from the 17th and 18th centuries are used to show how the concepts of presumption and presumption rule have been applied in hermeneutics to specify and systematise the hermeneutical rules that have been handed down. I will conclude with an appeal to German-speaking lawyers. \/ La premi\u00e8re partie examine, notamment en ce qui concerne Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, comment le concept de pr\u00e9somption a \u00e9t\u00e9 extrait de la doctrine juridique de la preuve, puis g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9 et d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 pour l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie et la m\u00e9thodologie g\u00e9n\u00e9rales. Dans la deuxi\u00e8me partie, des exemples choisis des XVIIe et XIIIe si\u00e8cles sont utilis\u00e9s pour montrer comment les concepts de pr\u00e9somption et de r\u00e8gle de pr\u00e9somption ont \u00e9t\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9s en herm\u00e9neutique pour sp\u00e9cifier et syst\u00e9matiser les r\u00e8gles herm\u00e9neutiques qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 transmises. Je conclurai par un appel aux juristes germanophones.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Christian Berner: Billigkeit. Meiers <em>Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst<\/em> und ihr Verh\u00e4ltnis zur Jurisprudenz. S. 234-243 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> In 1757, Georg Friedrich Meier presented a compendium for his hermeneutics lectures in the form of Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst, which, as explicitly \u203ageneral\u2039 hermeneutics, aims towards an interpretation of all signs \u2013 both natural and arbitrary. Meier\u2019s hermeneutics claims to provide the theoretical and practical foundations for special hermeneutics. The following article elaborates the elements of legal hermeneutics found in Meier\u2019s art of interpretation. \/ En 1757, Georg Friedrich Meier pr\u00e9sente dans son Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst un recueil de ses cours d\u2019herm\u00e9neutique qui, en tant qu\u2019herm\u00e9neutique explicitement \u203ag\u00e9n\u00e9rale\u2039, aspire \u00e0 une interpr\u00e9tation de tous les signes, tant naturels qu\u2019arbitraires. L\u2019herm\u00e9neutique de Meier pr\u00e9tend fournir les fondements th\u00e9oriques et pratiques d\u2019une herm\u00e9neutique sp\u00e9ciale. L\u2019article suivant d\u00e9veloppe les \u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u2019une herm\u00e9neutique juridique que l\u2019on retrouve dans l\u2019art de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de Meier.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> In 1757, Georg Friedrich Meier presented a compendium for his hermeneutics lectures in the form of Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst, which, as explicitly \u203ageneral\u2039 hermeneutics, aims towards an interpretation of all signs \u2013 both natural and arbitrary. Meier\u2019s hermeneutics claims to provide the theoretical and practical foundations for special hermeneutics. The following article elaborates the elements of legal hermeneutics found in Meier\u2019s art of interpretation. \/ En 1757, Georg Friedrich Meier pr\u00e9sente dans son Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst un recueil de ses cours d\u2019herm\u00e9neutique qui, en tant qu\u2019herm\u00e9neutique explicitement \u203ag\u00e9n\u00e9rale\u2039, aspire \u00e0 une interpr\u00e9tation de tous les signes, tant naturels qu\u2019arbitraires. L\u2019herm\u00e9neutique de Meier pr\u00e9tend fournir les fondements th\u00e9oriques et pratiques d\u2019une herm\u00e9neutique sp\u00e9ciale. L\u2019article suivant d\u00e9veloppe les \u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u2019une herm\u00e9neutique juridique que l\u2019on retrouve dans l\u2019art de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de Meier.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Matthias Kaufmann: Giambattista Vico: Hermeneutik als Deutung des Menschengemachten. <br>S. 244-256 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> Giambattista Vico is often seen as an early representative of hermeneutics, using a combination of philology and metaphysics to apply the epistemological principle verum et factum convertuntur not to nature, but to (legal) history, because history is man-made. He describes this legal history as a sequence of a \u203adivine\u2039, a \u203aheroic\u2039 and a \u203ahuman\u2039 form of law, corresponding to the gradual development of human reason. As there are common elements in all human political societies, a historical as well as a legal form of hermeneutics is possible. \/ Giambattista Vico est souvent consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un repr\u00e9sentant pr\u00e9coce de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique, combinant la philologie et la m\u00e9taphysique pour appliquer le principe \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique verum et factum convertuntur non pas \u00e0 la nature, mais \u00e0 l\u2019histoire (juridique), parce que l\u2019histoire est faite par l\u2019homme. Il d\u00e9crit cette histoire juridique comme une s\u00e9quence d\u2019une forme du droit \u203adivine\u2039, \u203ah\u00e9ro\u00efque\u2039 et \u203ahumaine\u2039, correspondant au d\u00e9veloppement progressif de la raison humaine. Comme il existe des \u00e9l\u00e9ments communs \u00e0 toutes les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s politiques humaines, une forme d\u2019herm\u00e9neutique tant historique que juridique est possible.<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> Giambattista Vico is often seen as an early representative of hermeneutics, using a combination of philology and metaphysics to apply the epistemological principle verum et factum convertuntur not to nature, but to (legal) history, because history is man-made. He describes this legal history as a sequence of a \u203adivine\u2039, a \u203aheroic\u2039 and a \u203ahuman\u2039 form of law, corresponding to the gradual development of human reason. As there are common elements in all human political societies, a historical as well as a legal form of hermeneutics is possible. \/ Giambattista Vico est souvent consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un repr\u00e9sentant pr\u00e9coce de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique, combinant la philologie et la m\u00e9taphysique pour appliquer le principe \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique verum et factum convertuntur non pas \u00e0 la nature, mais \u00e0 l\u2019histoire (juridique), parce que l\u2019histoire est faite par l\u2019homme. Il d\u00e9crit cette histoire juridique comme une s\u00e9quence d\u2019une forme du droit \u203adivine\u2039, \u203ah\u00e9ro\u00efque\u2039 et \u203ahumaine\u2039, correspondant au d\u00e9veloppement progressif de la raison humaine. Comme il existe des \u00e9l\u00e9ments communs \u00e0 toutes les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s politiques humaines, une forme d\u2019herm\u00e9neutique tant historique que juridique est possible.<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Falk Bretschneider, Rainer Maria Kiesow, Claudine Moulin, Christof Sch\u00f6ch: Die alten W\u00f6rter des Rechts. \u00dcber MetaLEX \u2013 digitale Metalexikographie der historischen Rechtssprachen in Europa. <br>S. 257-272 <div><div class=\"spoiler-wrap\"><div class=\"spoiler-head no-icon  collapsed\" title=\"Expand\">Abstract<\/div><div class=\"spoiler-body\" style=\"display: none;\"> Law is spoken; it arises from words, which, in turn, must be understood. This text deals with the diversity of these words and the resulting diversity of legal languages. Based on the treatise Dei delitti e delle pene (1765) by the Milanese criminal law thinker Cesare Beccaria and its countless translations into other European languages, it presents an analytical model that attempts to open up new avenues of research and reflection for the linguistically convoluted hermeneutics of law using the tools of digital humanities. \/ Le droit est parl\u00e9. Il provient de mots qui, \u00e0 leur tour, doivent \u00eatre compris. Le pr\u00e9sent article aborde la question de la diversit\u00e9 de ces mots et de la diversit\u00e9 des langues juridiques qui en d\u00e9coule. Il pr\u00e9sente un mod\u00e8le d\u2019analyse \u00e0 partir du trait\u00e9 Dei delitti e delle pene (1765) du juriste milanais Cesare Beccaria et de ses innombrables traductions dans d\u2019autres langues europ\u00e9ennes. Ce mod\u00e8le tente, en recourant aux m\u00e9thodes des humanit\u00e9s num\u00e9riques, d\u2019ouvrir de nouvelles voies de recherche et de r\u00e9flexion \u00e0 l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique juridique entretiss\u00e9e de langues..<\/div><noscript><div class=\"spoiler-body\"> Law is spoken; it arises from words, which, in turn, must be understood. This text deals with the diversity of these words and the resulting diversity of legal languages. Based on the treatise Dei delitti e delle pene (1765) by the Milanese criminal law thinker Cesare Beccaria and its countless translations into other European languages, it presents an analytical model that attempts to open up new avenues of research and reflection for the linguistically convoluted hermeneutics of law using the tools of digital humanities. \/ Le droit est parl\u00e9. Il provient de mots qui, \u00e0 leur tour, doivent \u00eatre compris. Le pr\u00e9sent article aborde la question de la diversit\u00e9 de ces mots et de la diversit\u00e9 des langues juridiques qui en d\u00e9coule. Il pr\u00e9sente un mod\u00e8le d\u2019analyse \u00e0 partir du trait\u00e9 Dei delitti e delle pene (1765) du juriste milanais Cesare Beccaria et de ses innombrables traductions dans d\u2019autres langues europ\u00e9ennes. Ce mod\u00e8le tente, en recourant aux m\u00e9thodes des humanit\u00e9s num\u00e9riques, d\u2019ouvrir de nouvelles voies de recherche et de r\u00e9flexion \u00e0 l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique juridique entretiss\u00e9e de langues..<\/div><\/noscript><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Aus der Forschung<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Andreas Rutz \u00fcber Andreas Christoph (Hg.): Kartieren um 1800 (2019)<\/li><li>Hania Siebenpfeiffer \u00fcber Reto R\u00f6ssler: Poetologien kosmologischen Wissens der Aufkl\u00e4rung (2020)<\/li><li>Christina Vanja \u00fcber Nina L\u00fckewille: Georg Wilhelm Stein d. \u00c4. (1737-1803) in Kassel. Ein fr\u00fcher Repr\u00e4sentant der akademischen Geburtsmedizin (2020)<\/li><li>Alessio Panichi \u00fcber Fiormichele Benigni: Itinerari dell\u2019antispinozismo. Spinoza e le metafisiche cartesiane in Francia (1684-1718) (2018)<\/li><li>Editha Weber \u00fcber Werner Telesko, Sandra Hertel u. Stefanie Linsboth (Hg.): Die Repr\u00e4sentation Maria Theresias. Herrschaft und Bildpolitik im Zeitalter der Aufkl\u00e4rung (2020)<\/li><li>Helga Meise \u00fcber Luisa Banki u. Katharina Wittler (Hg.): Lekt\u00fcre und Geschlecht im 18. Jahrhundert. Zur Situativit\u00e4t des Lesens zwischen Einsamkeit und Geselligkeit (2020)<\/li><li>Thomas Biskup \u00fcber Claus Legal u. Gert Legal: Friedrich II. von Preu\u00dfen und Quintus Icilius. Der K\u00f6nig und der Obrist. Historische Zeugnisse von Wahrheit und Wahrscheinlichkeit, Deutung und Bedeutung (2020)<\/li><li>Adam Sutcliffe \u00fcber Uta Lohmann: Haskala und allgemeine Menschenbildung. David Friedl\u00e4nder und Wilhelm von Humboldt im Gespr\u00e4ch: Zur Wechselwirkung zwischen j\u00fcdischer Aufkl\u00e4rung und neuhumanistischer Bildungstheorie. Studien \u2013 Editionen \u2013 Analysen (2020)<\/li><li>Stefanie Leibetseder \u00fcber L\u00e9a Kuhn: Gemalte Kunstgeschichte. Bildgenealogien in der Malerei um 1800 (2020)<\/li><li>Alessio Panichi \u00fcber Emanuele Levi Mortera: Dugald Stewart. Scienza della mente, metodo e senso comune (2018)<\/li><li>Michael Maurer \u00fcber Gerhard Sauder: Kein Herder-Bild. Studien zu einem Weimarer Klassiker (2018) <\/li><li>Alexander Schunka \u00fcber Daniel Fulda u. Primin Stekeler-Weithofer (Hg.): Theatrum naturae et artium \u2013 Leibniz und die Schaupl\u00e4tze der Aufkl\u00e4rung. Sitzungsberichte der S\u00e4chsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Philologisch-historische Klasse (2019)<\/li><li>J\u00fcrgen Overhoff \u00fcber Holger B\u00f6ning: Der Noten und des Gl\u00fcckes Lauf. Georg Philipp Telemann. Ein poetischer Spaziergang durch das Leben des Dichters und Publizisten (2020)<\/li><li>Stefan Borchers \u00fcber Ruth Albrecht (Hg.): Begeisterte M\u00e4gde. Tr\u00e4ume, Visionen und Offenbarungen von Frauen des fr\u00fchen Pietismus (2018)<\/li><li>Andreas B\u00fcrgi \u00fcber Stefan Howald u. Bernhard Wiebel (Hg.): Das Ph\u00e4nomen M\u00fcnchhausen. Neue Perspektiven (2020)<\/li><li>Ursula Goldenbaum \u00fcber Christoph Schulte: Von Moses bis Moses &#8230; Der j\u00fcdische Mendelssohn (2020)<\/li><li>Rita Unfer Lukoschik \u00fcber Lianming Wang: Jesuitenerbe in Peking. Sakralbauten und transkulturelle R\u00e4ume 1600-1800 (2020) und Thomas Irvine: Listening to China. Sound and the Sino-Western Encounter 1770-1839 (2020)<\/li><li>Vanessa de Senarclens \u00fcber Antoine Lilti: L\u2019h\u00e9ritage des Lumi\u00e8res. Ambivalences de la modernit\u00e9 (2019)<\/li><li>Sotirios Agrofylax \u00fcber Annika Hildebrandt: Die Mobilisierung der Poesie. Literatur und Krieg um 1750 (2019)<\/li><li>Nora Ramtke \u00fcber Dirk Niefanger u. Dirk Rose (Hg.): \u00bbGesammlet und ans Licht gestellet\u00ab. Poesie, Theologie und Musik in Anthologien des fr\u00fchen 18. Jahrhunderts (2019)<\/li><li>Carl Niekerk \u00fcber Hendrikje Schauer: Beobachtung und Urteil. Literarische Aufkl\u00e4rung bei Lessing und Wieland (2019)<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sonstiges<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Eingegangene B\u00fccher<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jahrgang 45 (2021) Heft 2 Heft2 (2021) Jahrgang45 Konzipiert von Frank Grunert und Denis Thouard Aus der Arbeit der DGEJ Zu diesem Heft (Stefanie Stockhorst) Die Welt im Dorf: Begegnungen mit dem Fremden und Exotischen im 18. Jahrhundert jenseits der gro\u00dfen Globalisierungszentren. Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f\u00fcr die Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts vom 09.-10. September 2021 an der Herzog August<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/2021\/12\/02\/hermeneutik-und-recht-im-18-jahrhundert\/\">Weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1224"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1224"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1312,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1224\/revisions\/1312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgej.hab.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}